When a person enters a nursing home, who signs the legal documents? Themselves, the wife, the children, the stepchildren? Doe...Read more
Nursing Home Liable for Not Supervising Smoking Resident
- November 29th, 2001
A California court rules that a nursing home was largely responsible for the injuries of a resident who accidentally set himself on fire while smoking. Lawson v. Skyline Healthcare Center (Cal. Ct. App., 2 App. Dist., B142164, Oct. 3, 2001)
Leonard Lawson suffered from acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and was a patient at Skyline Healthcare Center, a skilled nursing facility. Mr. Lawson's medications often made him fall asleep in his wheelchair. Because Mr. Lawson liked to smoke, Skyline instituted a plan of care that ensured he would smoke in a safe environment. Under the plan, Mr. Lawson had to obtain cigarettes from the nurses' station, had to smoke in a designated area (the patio), and would be supervised by a nurse or other staff member while smoking. Although Mr. Lawson complied with his part of the plan, Skyline staff members rarely supervised him during his trips to the patio to smoke.
On December 27, 1997, while smoking alone on the patio, Mr. Lawson lit the wrong end of a cigarette and started a fire that spread to his body, causing severe injuries. Mr. Lawson sued Skyline for negligence. A jury found that both parties were negligent, although not equally: Skyline was 70 percent to blame and Mr. Lawson 30 percent. The jury awarded Mr. Lawson $73,777 for medical expenses and $250,000 for pain and suffering. Skyline appealed, arguing that Mr. Lawson was solely to blame for his injuries because he was aware of the risks of smoking without supervision.
The California Court of Appeal agrees with the jury. The court concludes that Skyline failed in its duty to protect Mr. Lawson from the harm caused by unsupervised smoking. The court notes that California's regulations governing skilled nursing facilities allow smoking only in designated areas and only under the 'periodic observation of facility personnel or responsible adults.' The court rejects Skyline's defense that it was only honoring Mr. Lawson's desire to smoke alone, as it would honor any patient's right to refuse medical treatment. Remarking that this argument borders on the frivolous, the court stresses that Skyline had a mandatory duty to provide supervision, whether or not Mr. Lawson wanted it. (Mr. Lawson died while the case was being appealed.)
This opinion has not yet been published. To download the unpublished version, go to http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/npopinions.cgi, select '2nd Appellate District' and then search for 'B142164'.
Local Elder Law Attorneys in Ashburn, VA
Hale Ball Carlson Baumgartner Murphy PLC
Attorney Samantha Simmons Fredieu is an associate at Hale Ball. Ms. Fredieu graduated magna cum laude from Vermont Law School where she was the symposium editor on the Vermont Law Review, a production editor on the Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, and a member of the Moot Court Advisory Board. She has clerked for...
Needham Mitnick & Pollack, PLC
Judith Mtinick is well known for acting as a guardian, conservator, trustee or agent on behalf of clients or by court appointment. This experience gives her a wide perspective and extensive practical knowledge that she uses when advising clients in drafting their planning documents. Her experience, as a court appointed...
Law Offices of John L. Laster
John Laster is a lawyer licensed to practice in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. He limits his practice to wealth transfer planning, trusts, wills, powers of attorney, health care decision-making issues, estate administration and related tax, elder law and disability concerns. Listed in The Best Lawyers...