The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional, clearing the...Read more
Supreme Court Says Deceased Employee's Ex-Wife Can Get His Pension Benefits
- January 28th, 2009
A new Supreme Court decision illustrates the importance of making sure your beneficiary designations are up-to-date. The Court has unanimously ruled that an employer must distribute a deceased employee's retirement benefits to his ex-wife even though she had renounced the benefits in their divorce. Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Sav. and Investment Plan (U.S., No. 07-636, Jan. 26, 2009).
William Kennedy worked for DuPont Co. and had a retirement plan through the company. His wife, Liv, was the designated beneficiary of the plan. In 1994, William and Liv divorced and the divorce decree stated that Liv waived the right to any of William's retirement plans. However, William never changed the beneficiary designation on his retirement plan. When William died, his daughter, who was the executor of his estate, asked DuPont to distribute the plan to the estate. But DuPont relied on William's beneficiary designation and instead distributed the plan benefits, totaling $402,000, to Liv.
Local Elder Law Attorneys in Ashburn, VA
Felinton Elder Law & Estate Planning Centers
Mindy Felinton concentrates in the areas of Medicaid planning, Veterans' Benefits, asset protection, nursing home planning, elder law, wills, estate planning, trusts, living wills, powers of attorney, probate administration and trust administration and began her legal career 30 years ago as an Assistant State Attorney...
Margaret A. O'Reilly, PC
Margaret A. O’Reilly is an estate planning and elder law attorney with over thirty-five years of legal experience. Attorney O’Reilly graduated from Duke University with a degree in psychology, and received her law degree from Northeastern University School of Law in Boston, Massachusetts. For over 15 y...
William's estate sued DuPont under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), claiming that in signing the divorce decree, Liv had voluntarily relinquished, or waived, her right to the plan benefits. A U.S. district court ordered DuPont to pay the value of the plan to the estate. Liv appealed and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the district court's ruling, holding that Liv had not waived her right to the plan benefits. DuPont then appealed.
In an opinion written by Justice David Souter, the U.S. Supreme Court agrees with the Court of Appeals and holds that according to ERISA, DuPont had to follow William's instructions on the original document and distribute the retirement benefits to Liv. The Court notes that William had an easy way to change the beneficiary designation, but he chose not to.
For more on keeping beneficiary designations up to date, click here.
Last Modified: 01/28/2009